On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 11:38 AM, Eric Anholt <e...@anholt.net> wrote: > On Mon, 21 May 2012 20:36:52 +0200, Sven Joachim <svenj...@gmx.de> wrote: >> On 2012-05-17 17:17 +0200, Sven Joachim wrote: >> >> > On 2012-05-17 15:58 +0200, Brian Paul wrote: >> > >> >> On 05/17/2012 04:42 AM, Sven Joachim wrote: >> >>> Hi, >> >>> >> >>> Commit 63720114b42 in mesa removed the GLw source which is now provided >> >>> in a separate source tree. However, no release has been made from that >> >>> tree yet, so users of Mesa 8.0+ have to resort to the git tree to obtain >> >>> GLw. I don't personally care about GLw, but in Debian there are still a >> >>> few packages that use it¹. >> >>> >> >>> How about making a GLw release, say with a version of 8.0? >> >> >> >> The Mesa version number isn't really applicable to GLw. >> > >> > This may be so, but starting with 8.0 would make it easier for distros >> > who have already provided 7.x.y packages from the Mesa source. >> >> At least that was the rationale why demos started at 8.0.0 in the first >> release after they were moved to their own repository. >> >> For Debian it would be a minor inconvenience to re-start with version >> 1.0, don't know about other distros. > > Yeah, revving versions of split out packages back to 1.0 is a minor pain > for every distro, and is good to avoid.
I'm fine with bumping the version to 8.0.0. But I took a quick look at configure.ac and I have no idea how do implement it. configure seems to wind up using 1.0.0 by default. Patches, anyone? -Brian _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
