On Thu, 4 Apr 2019 at 17:58, Dylan Baker <dy...@pnwbakers.com> wrote: > > Quoting Hota, Alok (2019-04-04 09:44:40) > > > > Can you elaborate what seems to be the problem? I'm more than happy to > > > > rework the patch so it works for you guys - do you have a WIP branch > > > > somewhere? > > > > > > > Humble ping? > > > > > > It's been 2 months since I've put this forward. In this time we could have > > > merged it resolving a massive hack we had for years. > > > Plus as pointed out I'm happy to help with the future work, but blocking > > > on > > > that and sitting is rather alienating :-( > > > > > > If future work has not landed yet, I would suggest we merge this. > > > > > > What do you think? > > > > > > > Sorry again for letting this hang and alienating you. I appreciate you > > pinging this as it had completely dropped off my radar on accident. We did > > have an internal discussion about this, but it ended vaguely in dissent, > > though it's not totally clear _why_ some of our collaborators did not like > > the approach. > > > > I think this is worth pursuing, though, so I will bring it up again in our > > group discussion. Thanks again for providing the patch, and I will let you > > know if we need your help with this moving forward. > > _______________________________________________ > > mesa-stable mailing list > > mesa-sta...@lists.freedesktop.org > > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-stable > > I want to mention again that we are very close to being able to drop > autotools, > and this will not be a problem when we do since the tarball wont be > bootstrapped. > Autotools or not the current patch is step in the right direction ;-)
-Emil _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
