On Wednesday, March 20, 2019 6:37:07 AM PDT Ilia Mirkin wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 6, 2019 at 3:32 AM Kenneth Graunke <kenn...@whitecape.org> wrote:
> > There are no nouveau changes in this patch, but that's only because none
> > appeared to be necessary.  Most drivers performed some kind of flush on
> > any memory_barrier() call, regardless of the bits - but nouveau's hooks
> > don't.  So the newly added case would already be a no-op.
> 
> I didn't go back to check the code earlier, but just saw the pushed
> patch, forgot this comment, and decided to check. Looks like
> 
> https://cgit.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/tree/src/gallium/drivers/nouveau/nvc0/nvc0_context.c#n90
> 
> would get executed, no?
> 
>   -ilia

Yikes...apparently failed at reading.  I pushed a quick fix with the
same code to bail that I put in all the other drivers:

https://cgit.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/commit/?id=3c3f250456623d9892042a6d296e77d359702add

I also re-checked nv50 and it seemed fine.

Thanks!
--Ken

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

_______________________________________________
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev

Reply via email to