On Tue, Dec 18, 2018, 9:57 PM Samuel Pitoiset <samuel.pitoi...@gmail.com
wrote:
> We don't ever want to do the fmask lookup on a atomic or
> store, the fmask should have been decompressed if the
> surface has been moved to IMAGE_LAYOUT.
>
Clarify the description to be a *storage* image layout?
>
> Original patch by Dave Airlie.
>
> Signed-off-by: Samuel Pitoiset <samuel.pitoi...@gmail.com>
> ---
> src/amd/common/ac_nir_to_llvm.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/src/amd/common/ac_nir_to_llvm.c
> b/src/amd/common/ac_nir_to_llvm.c
> index 225c930d896..0f57dc7eeb4 100644
> --- a/src/amd/common/ac_nir_to_llvm.c
> +++ b/src/amd/common/ac_nir_to_llvm.c
> @@ -2243,7 +2243,7 @@ static void get_image_coords(struct ac_nir_context
> *ctx,
> bool gfx9_1d = ctx->ac.chip_class >= GFX9 && dim ==
> GLSL_SAMPLER_DIM_1D;
> count = image_type_to_components_count(dim, is_array);
>
> - if (is_ms) {
> + if (is_ms && instr->intrinsic == nir_intrinsic_image_deref_load) {
> LLVMValueRef fmask_load_address[3];
> int chan;
>
> --
> 2.20.1
>
> _______________________________________________
> mesa-dev mailing list
> mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
>
_______________________________________________
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
