On 2018-11-30 4:57 p.m., Daniel Stone wrote: > On Wed, 28 Nov 2018 at 17:23, Dylan Baker <dy...@pnwbakers.com> wrote: > >> Personally speaking, I think that better next steps for gitlab integration >> are: >> - migrate from bugzilla to gitlab issues > > This is currently held up by a mutual death grip: both AMD and Intel > want to be able to move or reassign issues between kernel / Mesa / X11 > within Bugzilla, so have requested that nothing moves until everything > moves. I don't know whether that has to be one big flag day or whether > the driver teams would find it acceptable for all three components to > have a documented plan with a timeline on it. Intel also have some > pretty heavy scripting and tooling around Bugzilla which would need to > be modified to track GitLab instead. > > From an infrastructure point of view though, Bugzilla is getting less > and less acceptable to run as a service.
Well, getting rid of Bugzilla entirely requires migrating all remaining bugs somewhere else anyway. :) As long as kernel / Mesa / xf86-video-amdgpu/ati bugs are all migrated to GitLab issues, that should be fine from an AMD perspective FWIW. -- Earthling Michel Dänzer | http://www.amd.com Libre software enthusiast | Mesa and X developer _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
