This shouldn't make any difference but I feel uneasy to use the
expanded aspects that do not represent the image in its entirety. If
we ever change the implementation of the anv_image_aspect_to_plane()
helper, this is safer.
Signed-off-by: Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwer...@intel.com>
---
src/intel/vulkan/anv_image.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/src/intel/vulkan/anv_image.c b/src/intel/vulkan/anv_image.c
index 1d1ec4befe4..7a06bde8e9e 100644
--- a/src/intel/vulkan/anv_image.c
+++ b/src/intel/vulkan/anv_image.c
@@ -1323,7 +1323,7 @@ anv_CreateImageView(VkDevice _device,
uint32_t iaspect_bit, vplane = 0;
anv_foreach_image_aspect_bit(iaspect_bit, image, expanded_aspects) {
uint32_t iplane =
- anv_image_aspect_to_plane(expanded_aspects, 1UL << iaspect_bit);
+ anv_image_aspect_to_plane(image->aspects, 1UL << iaspect_bit);
VkImageAspectFlags vplane_aspect =
anv_plane_to_aspect(iview->aspect_mask, vplane);
struct anv_format_plane format =
--
2.19.1
_______________________________________________
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
