Hi Halley, 2012/4/23 Zhao, Halley <halley.z...@intel.com>:
> Could you give us some comments on this new proposal by using gbm? It seems your patches 3/4 and 4/4 did not reach the list, according the archives. Could you please repost them? Moving wayland-*.xml to Weston is a bad idea IMHO. Other compositors could also use the same interface. I believe the following could be done instead: 1. Mark wl_drm interfaces as "deprecated" at the linker level, for mesa next-release. Then, remove it for next.next-release or next^3-release. 2. Create a new wl_gbm interface (and directory), derived from the current wayland-drm/. I think gbm/frontends/wayland/ could be appropriate for it. Exported prefix for this API would be wl_gbm_ and not wayland_gbm_, in order to align with naming conventions for e.g. wl_shm buffer interface. Prerequisite for (2) would be the addition of a gbm_bo_create_from_native_handle() API + vfunc? You almost had it in your former patch 2/3. A gbm_bo_handle arg would be better IMHO. Regards, Gwenole. _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
