Quoting Bas Nieuwenhuizen (2018-09-20 11:16:44) > On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 7:33 PM Eric Engestrom <eric.engest...@intel.com> > wrote: > > > > On Thursday, 2018-09-20 19:17:57 +0200, Bas Nieuwenhuizen wrote: > > > Was missing the init, found by Emil. > > > > > > Fixes: d17443a4593 "radv: Use build ID if available for cache UUID." > > > > Reviewed-by: Eric Engestrom <eric.engest...@intel.com> > > > > > CC: <mesa-sta...@lists.freedesktop.org> > > > > Cc'ing mesa-stable has no effect when you're already adding the > > proper Fixes: tag :) > > Last time I asked about the difference between Fixes and CC, the > conclusion I got that Fixes is only best effort for the stable > branches and that if it does not apply it will be dropped silently, > while for the CC ones the release manager will notify you.
That is not the way I treat fixes, I don't know what Juan and Andres do. I very
much *prefer* fixes tags. The scripts are much smarter about figuring out if
this patch is meant for my tree or not (ie, things with "cc: 18.2 <stable>" show
up in the list of patches for 18.1, but "Fixes: abcdef ("only in 18.2")" do not.
I can't speak for others, but I follow up on all patches that don't apply unless
they're reverted on master.
Dylan
signature.asc
Description: signature
_______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
