Quoting andrey simiklit (2018-08-21 13:00:57)
> Hi all,
>
> The bug for this issue was created:
> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107626
What about something like
diff --git a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_draw.c
b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_draw.c
index 8536c040109..babb8d4676d 100644
--- a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_draw.c
+++ b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_draw.c
@@ -885,7 +885,7 @@ brw_draw_single_prim(struct gl_context *ctx,
{
struct brw_context *brw = brw_context(ctx);
const struct gen_device_info *devinfo = &brw->screen->devinfo;
- bool fail_next = false;
+ bool fail_next;
/* Flag BRW_NEW_DRAW_CALL on every draw. This allows us to have
* atoms that happen on every draw call.
@@ -898,6 +898,7 @@ brw_draw_single_prim(struct gl_context *ctx,
intel_batchbuffer_require_space(brw, 1500);
brw_require_statebuffer_space(brw, 2400);
intel_batchbuffer_save_state(brw);
+ fail_next = brw->batch.saved.map_next == 0;
if (brw->num_instances != prim->num_instances ||
brw->basevertex != prim->basevertex ||
There's no point reverting to the last saved point if that save point is
the empty batch, we will just repeat ourselves.
-Chris
_______________________________________________
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
