On Die, 2012-04-10 at 22:59 +0400, Vadim Girlin wrote: > On Tue, 2012-04-10 at 09:53 +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote: > > On Mon, 2012-04-09 at 19:32 +0400, Vadim Girlin wrote: > > > > > > diff --git a/src/mesa/state_tracker/st_context.c > > > b/src/mesa/state_tracker/st_context.c > > > index a3fd4db..1e76501 100644 > > > --- a/src/mesa/state_tracker/st_context.c > > > +++ b/src/mesa/state_tracker/st_context.c > > > @@ -111,7 +111,7 @@ st_get_msaa(void) > > > > > > > > > static struct st_context * > > > -st_create_context_priv( struct gl_context *ctx, struct pipe_context > > > *pipe ) > > > +st_create_context_priv( struct gl_context *ctx, struct pipe_context > > > *pipe, const driOptionCache * optionCache ) > > > > This adds DRI specific code to the mesa state tracker, which is also > > used for non-DRI targets. I'm afraid there would have to be some kind of > > abstraction for this. > > Probably we could pass a single boolean value for now > (force_glsl_extensions_warn), maybe in some struct. Does it make sense?
I think so. -- Earthling Michel Dänzer | http://www.amd.com Libre software enthusiast | Debian, X and DRI developer _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
