On 08/22/2018 07:56 PM, Emil Velikov wrote:
Hi all,
Pardon for dropping in so late. I've seems to have missed this.
On 24 July 2018 at 14:24, Martin Fuzzey <martin.fuzzey@flowbird.group> wrote:
Hi Thomasz,
thanks for your reply
On 21/07/18 04:27, Tomasz Figa wrote:
As you noticed, this adds back the dependency on gralloc handle
structure. Moreover, it actually adds a dependency on the handle
having a binary format compatible with gralloc_gbm_handle_t. This is
not something that we can do in upstream Mesa, since there are more
platforms running gralloc implementations other than gbm_gralloc.
Looking at it a bit more is it really that bad?
Note that there are at least three different implementations - the
"original" drm_gralloc, gbm_gralloc (props to RobH) and an another one
used in CrOS (or was it Android?)
Chrome OS and Android Celadon use gralloc implemented in minigbm
library. I think proposal from Tomasz is the best one, implement API
between Mesa and gralloc to query modifiers. This makes it possible to
use multiple gralloc implementations.
The compile time dependency is on gralloc_handle.h which is actually part of
libdrm not a specific gralloc implementation.
Does mesa need to compile with old versions of libdrm?
0r is the structure going to be removed from libdrm?
I think you missed gbm in gralloc_*gbm*_handle_t. The header
gralloc_handle.h was added to libdrm by Robert Foss, explicitly to aim
and standardise things.
Unfortunately, I don't have a very good solution for this. In Chrome
OS we just don't support modifiers in EGL/GLES on Android. Obviously
it would be a good idea to have some way to query gralloc for the
modifier, but I don't see Android providing any generic way to do it.
The least evil I can think of as a makeshift for now could be an
optional gralloc0 perform call that returns the modifier for given
buffer.
An advantage of a new perform call would be that other gralloc
implementations could be extended to support it without changing their
handle structure but is that really likely?
I did not keep track of the gralloc_handle_t discussion, but Rob
(cc'd) should have some info.
From vague memory the standardized handle had means to track modifiers
amongst others.
That is obviously somewhat orthogonal to Android making it use of it ;-)
HTH
Emil
_______________________________________________
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
_______________________________________________
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev