Emil Velikov <emil.l.veli...@gmail.com> wrote: >Hi everyone, > >As Veluri has noticed, I made a few comments earlier to his proposal/plans. >Having a comprehensive configuration tool is a great task, although >there is an underlying issue as pointed out [A]. > >Or looking for a proper solution for [A]. Since that hack is for GLX >and we will need something alike it EGL. Ideally, a lot less hacky. >Sadly, resolving that is outside of my scope for the moment, but I am >happy to answer questions ;-) > >[A] >https://github.com/jlHertel/adriconf/commit/9c1c98633faff7b6b15be443da5cb9d8e90c50dd#diff->e9ffd8eaf9c59af94bc9cef7564301e5R14
Hi Emil, I think the biggest question here is: are we able to use only EGL and completely drop the Xlib calls even on a X.Org only application? If yes, then I think the best approach would be to make a EGL extension based on the two functions, and simply ignore the existing ones, so that backwars-compatibility stays the same. Apart from xdriinfo, driconf and adriconf, I don't think any other application uses those two functions, but in any case I think is better to don't break things. Kind Regards, Jean Hertel _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
