Andrey also opened a bug about this issue :
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107544
It feels like it should be fixed on master though. get_length()
shouldn't return -1 for structs anymore.
We should probably return 1 at end of get_length() so that the decoder
prints out "unknown instruction".
That would help spot potential errors and updates needed to genxml.
-
Lionel
On 10/08/18 16:48, Rafael Antognolli wrote:
On Thu, Aug 09, 2018 at 03:00:30PM +0300, andrey simiklit wrote:
Hi,
Sorry I missed the main thought here.
The "gen_group_get_length" function returns int
but the "iter_group_offset_bits" function returns uint32_t
So uint32_t(int(-32)) = 0xFFFFFFE0U and it looks like unexpected behavior for
me:
iter_group_offset_bits(iter, iter->group_iter + 1) < 0xFFFFFFE0U;
That's fine, I think the original commit message is good enough to
understand this change. Feel free to add this extra bit too if you want,
but I don't think it's needed.
Reviewed-by: Rafael Antognolli <rafael.antogno...@intel.com>
Regards,
Andrii.
On Thu, Aug 9, 2018 at 2:35 PM, Andrii Simiklit <asimiklit.w...@gmail.com>
wrote:
The "gen_group_get_length" function can return a negative value
and it can lead to the out of bounds group_iter.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Simiklit <andrii.simik...@globallogic.com>
---
src/intel/common/gen_decoder.c | 6 ++++--
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/intel/common/gen_decoder.c b/src/intel/common/gen_decoder
.c
index ec0a486..f09bd87 100644
--- a/src/intel/common/gen_decoder.c
+++ b/src/intel/common/gen_decoder.c
@@ -803,8 +803,10 @@ static bool
iter_more_groups(const struct gen_field_iterator *iter)
{
if (iter->group->variable) {
- return iter_group_offset_bits(iter, iter->group_iter + 1) <
- (gen_group_get_length(iter->group, iter->p) * 32);
+ const int length = gen_group_get_length(iter->group, iter->p);
+ return length > 0 &&
+ iter_group_offset_bits(iter, iter->group_iter + 1) <
+ (length * 32);
} else {
return (iter->group_iter + 1) < iter->group->group_count ||
iter->group->next != NULL;
--
2.7.4
_______________________________________________
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev