Assuming this doesn't break anything, patch is:
Reviewed-by: Samuel Pitoiset <samuel.pitoi...@gmail.com>
On 07/17/2018 11:06 AM, Bas Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
Aligning with AMDVLK on GFX9. I don't think it changes much.
On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 9:15 AM, Samuel Pitoiset
<samuel.pitoi...@gmail.com> wrote:
Why do we need that? Are you sure it's correct?
On 07/14/2018 02:28 PM, Bas Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
When no occlusion queries are active even if out of order is enabled.
---
src/amd/vulkan/radv_cmd_buffer.c | 4 +---
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/amd/vulkan/radv_cmd_buffer.c
b/src/amd/vulkan/radv_cmd_buffer.c
index b6729e40b4..78838d9939 100644
--- a/src/amd/vulkan/radv_cmd_buffer.c
+++ b/src/amd/vulkan/radv_cmd_buffer.c
@@ -1561,10 +1561,8 @@ void radv_set_db_count_control(struct
radv_cmd_buffer *cmd_buffer)
R_028A4C_PA_SC_MODE_CNTL_1,
pa_sc_mode_cntl_1);
}
- db_count_control = 0;
- } else {
- db_count_control =
S_028004_ZPASS_INCREMENT_DISABLE(1);
}
+ db_count_control = S_028004_ZPASS_INCREMENT_DISABLE(1);
} else {
const struct radv_subpass *subpass =
cmd_buffer->state.subpass;
uint32_t sample_rate = subpass ?
util_logbase2(subpass->max_sample_count) : 0;
_______________________________________________
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
