---
src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_bufmgr.c | 46 ++++++--------------------
src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_bufmgr.h | 1 -
2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_bufmgr.c
b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_bufmgr.c
index 58bb559fdee..e9d3daa5985 100644
--- a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_bufmgr.c
+++ b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_bufmgr.c
@@ -448,11 +448,6 @@ int
brw_bo_busy(struct brw_bo *bo)
{
struct brw_bufmgr *bufmgr = bo->bufmgr;
-
- /* If we know it's idle, don't bother with the kernel round trip */
- if (bo->idle && !bo->external)
- return false;
-
struct drm_i915_gem_busy busy = { .handle = bo->gem_handle };
int ret = drmIoctl(bufmgr->fd, DRM_IOCTL_I915_GEM_BUSY, &busy);
@@ -506,20 +501,11 @@ bo_alloc_internal(struct brw_bufmgr *bufmgr,
struct bo_cache_bucket *bucket;
bool alloc_from_cache;
uint64_t bo_size;
- bool busy = false;
bool zeroed = false;
- if (flags & BO_ALLOC_BUSY)
- busy = true;
-
if (flags & BO_ALLOC_ZEROED)
zeroed = true;
- /* BUSY does doesn't really jive with ZEROED as we have to wait for it to
- * be idle before we can memset. Just disallow that combination.
- */
- assert(!(busy && zeroed));
-
/* Round the allocated size up to a power of two number of pages. */
bucket = bucket_for_size(bufmgr, size);
@@ -539,29 +525,17 @@ bo_alloc_internal(struct brw_bufmgr *bufmgr,
retry:
alloc_from_cache = false;
if (bucket != NULL && !list_empty(&bucket->head)) {
- if (busy && !zeroed) {
- /* Allocate new render-target BOs from the tail (MRU)
- * of the list, as it will likely be hot in the GPU
- * cache and in the aperture for us. If the caller
- * asked us to zero the buffer, we don't want this
- * because we are going to mmap it.
- */
- bo = LIST_ENTRY(struct brw_bo, bucket->head.prev, head);
- list_del(&bo->head);
+ /* For non-render-target BOs (where we're probably
+ * going to map it first thing in order to fill it
+ * with data), check if the last BO in the cache is
+ * unbusy, and only reuse in that case. Otherwise,
+ * allocating a new buffer is probably faster than
+ * waiting for the GPU to finish.
+ */
+ bo = LIST_ENTRY(struct brw_bo, bucket->head.next, head);
+ if (!brw_bo_busy(bo)) {
alloc_from_cache = true;
- } else {
- /* For non-render-target BOs (where we're probably
- * going to map it first thing in order to fill it
- * with data), check if the last BO in the cache is
- * unbusy, and only reuse in that case. Otherwise,
- * allocating a new buffer is probably faster than
- * waiting for the GPU to finish.
- */
- bo = LIST_ENTRY(struct brw_bo, bucket->head.next, head);
- if (!brw_bo_busy(bo)) {
- alloc_from_cache = true;
- list_del(&bo->head);
- }
+ list_del(&bo->head);
}
if (alloc_from_cache) {
diff --git a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_bufmgr.h
b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_bufmgr.h
index 32fc7a553c9..d3b3aadc0db 100644
--- a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_bufmgr.h
+++ b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_bufmgr.h
@@ -195,7 +195,6 @@ struct brw_bo {
bool cache_coherent;
};
-#define BO_ALLOC_BUSY (1<<0)
#define BO_ALLOC_ZEROED (1<<1)
/**
--
2.17.1
_______________________________________________
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
