On Tue, 2018-05-29 at 18:35 +0100, Emil Velikov wrote: > On 29 May 2018 at 15:29, Daniel Stone <dan...@fooishbar.org> wrote: > > On 29 May 2018 at 15:17, Eric Engestrom <eric.engest...@intel.com> wrote: > > > On Tuesday, 2018-05-29 09:50:46 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote: > > > > GL_LIB expands to GLX_mesa, but applications should not link against > > > > that. -lGL is never wrong, just hardcode it. > > > > > > Agreed, and Archlinux has had this patch since basically forever: > > > https://git.archlinux.org/svntogit/packages.git/tree/trunk/0001-glvnd-fix-gl.pc.patch?h=packages/mesa > > > > Ugh. There's also this patch from February doing a similar thing: > > https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/206547/ > > > > Almost s/similar/better/ ;-) > > Unless I've missed something handful of the patches are still > unreviewed and applicable as-is. > Would have pushed the lot (with the cosmetics spotted by Dylan) yet > last time last few times there were plenty of unhappy people.
I put my name down as maintainer for src/glx/ and yet I don't get cc'd on things... That series has my: Reviewed-by: Adam Jackson <a...@redhat.com> - ajax _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
