On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 04:48:26PM -0700, Jason Ekstrand wrote: > It's clear that the original code meant to do this and there is even a > 10-line comment explaining why. Originally, we had a simple function > for packing the clear colors which was unaware of sRGB. However, in > a6b66a7b26ae1, when we started using ISL to do the packing, the wrong > format was used. > > Fixes: a6b66a7b26 "intel/blorp: Use ISL instead of bitcast_color..."
Thanks for spotting this: Reviewed-by: Topi Pohjolainen <topi.pohjolai...@intel.com> > --- > src/intel/blorp/blorp_blit.c | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/src/intel/blorp/blorp_blit.c b/src/intel/blorp/blorp_blit.c > index e825862..26bf442 100644 > --- a/src/intel/blorp/blorp_blit.c > +++ b/src/intel/blorp/blorp_blit.c > @@ -2562,7 +2562,7 @@ blorp_copy(struct blorp_batch *batch, > params.src.view.format)); > uint32_t packed[4]; > isl_color_value_pack(¶ms.src.clear_color, > - params.src.surf.format, packed); > + linear_src_format, packed); > isl_color_value_unpack(¶ms.src.clear_color, > params.src.view.format, packed); > } > @@ -2576,7 +2576,7 @@ blorp_copy(struct blorp_batch *batch, > params.dst.view.format)); > uint32_t packed[4]; > isl_color_value_pack(¶ms.dst.clear_color, > - params.dst.surf.format, packed); > + linear_dst_format, packed); > isl_color_value_unpack(¶ms.dst.clear_color, > params.dst.view.format, packed); > } > -- > 2.5.0.400.gff86faf > > _______________________________________________ > mesa-dev mailing list > mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev