On Wed, 2018-03-21 at 20:43 +0000, Emil Velikov wrote: > > All in all the idea sounds sane. As a summary/overall: > - Maintainer: open meta bug, send usual release plan + mention that > feature should be added to the tracker > - Developers: add bugs to tracker, or > - Developers: list via other means (email/IRC) of the features > they're aiming for -> Maintainer: add those to the tracker > - Maintainer: follow-up reminders closer to the branch point > - Maintainer: one week before branchpoint check with developers if > features are still on track - drop otherwise > And as always: > - Developers: can propose minor adjustments (need a definition, say 1 > week?) to the schedule up-to the 3 days before the branchpoint. > > Or in a sentence: There's no actual changes, things are better > documented and more explicit for everyone to see. > > I believe that describes it nicely, right?
Yes, good summary. > Andres care to do the honours and add that to the existing documentation? > Might be worth splitting it out to separate page, since the existing > one is getting bit cluttered. Right! I'll get to it and send a patch for review soon-ish. -- Br, Andres _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
