https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105507
--- Comment #4 from Pekka Paalanen <ppaala...@gmail.com> ---
(In reply to Daniel Stone from comment #2)
> You could place any orphaned wl_buffers on an per-surface list instead, and
> spin at destruction until that emptied.
What would guarantee that the last committed wl_buffer would actually get
released at all?
Destroying the EGLSurface cannot destroy the wl_surface, because the wl_surface
is caller-owned, isn't it?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
_______________________________________________
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
