On 2018-03-08 07:53 PM, Jason Ekstrand wrote: > On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 8:45 AM, Dylan Baker <dy...@pnwbakers.com > <mailto:dy...@pnwbakers.com>> wrote: > > > I know we've always given a lot of flexibility to vendor specific code > > (i965 or nouveau), but you hope everyone can understand my frustration > > with a 56 patch series that I sent review for 8 hours after it was > > posted to the list and I got told "Oh, I merged that hours ago, > > patches welcome." > > I can. I guess Jason got a bit carried away by the Vulkan 1.1 > excitement. > > > Perhaps. :-) I do think that being there day-1 is important.
The code was there on day 1 anyway. If being available in Git ASAP is that important (not sure why though), it can be made available in a repository other than the main shared one. > If nothing else, it shows the rest of the graphics community (who already > fears the concept of open-source) that working in the open isn't going > to cramp their style. It wasn't following the normal Mesa development process, so I'm not sure it's really useful for showing anything about that to anyone. -- Earthling Michel Dänzer | http://www.amd.com Libre software enthusiast | Mesa and X developer _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
