Tested-by: Rafael Antognolli <rafael.antogno...@intel.com>
On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 01:08:26PM -0800, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
> It's true for depth HiZ clears because we only have HiZ on single-slice
> images right now. However, for stencil-only clears there is no such
> restriction.
> ---
> src/intel/vulkan/genX_cmd_buffer.c | 9 ++++++---
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/src/intel/vulkan/genX_cmd_buffer.c
> b/src/intel/vulkan/genX_cmd_buffer.c
> index 8015a42..ce54624 100644
> --- a/src/intel/vulkan/genX_cmd_buffer.c
> +++ b/src/intel/vulkan/genX_cmd_buffer.c
> @@ -3438,9 +3438,12 @@ cmd_buffer_begin_subpass(struct anv_cmd_buffer
> *cmd_buffer,
>
> VK_IMAGE_ASPECT_STENCIL_BIT)) {
> if (att_state->fast_clear) {
> /* We currently only support HiZ for single-layer images */
> - assert(iview->planes[0].isl.base_level == 0);
> - assert(iview->planes[0].isl.base_array_layer == 0);
> - assert(fb->layers == 1);
> + if (att_state->pending_clear_aspects &
> VK_IMAGE_ASPECT_DEPTH_BIT) {
> + assert(iview->image->planes[0].aux_usage ==
> ISL_AUX_USAGE_HIZ);
> + assert(iview->planes[0].isl.base_level == 0);
> + assert(iview->planes[0].isl.base_array_layer == 0);
> + assert(fb->layers == 1);
> + }
>
> anv_image_hiz_clear(cmd_buffer, image,
> att_state->pending_clear_aspects,
> --
> 2.5.0.400.gff86faf
>
> _______________________________________________
> mesa-dev mailing list
> mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
_______________________________________________
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
