I'm wondering if it would help if no_rho_opt were const. But I suppose the problem there really is that the for loop and the if condition have swapped order the second time.
Reviewed-by: Roland Scheidegger <srol...@vmware.com> Am 10.02.2018 um 17:32 schrieb Eric Anholt: > My gcc doesn't figure out that dims >= 1 (seems reasonable), and doesn't > notice that ddmax is used from the same no_rho_opt as its initialization. > > Cc: Roland Scheidegger <srol...@vmware.com> > --- > src/gallium/auxiliary/gallivm/lp_bld_sample.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/src/gallium/auxiliary/gallivm/lp_bld_sample.c > b/src/gallium/auxiliary/gallivm/lp_bld_sample.c > index db3d9d65c9ca..ab9d051c9115 100644 > --- a/src/gallium/auxiliary/gallivm/lp_bld_sample.c > +++ b/src/gallium/auxiliary/gallivm/lp_bld_sample.c > @@ -275,7 +275,7 @@ lp_build_rho(struct lp_build_sample_context *bld, > rho = lp_build_mul(rho_bld, cubesize, rho); > } > else if (derivs) { > - LLVMValueRef ddmax[3], ddx[3], ddy[3]; > + LLVMValueRef ddmax[3] = { NULL }, ddx[3] = { NULL }, ddy[3] = { NULL }; > for (i = 0; i < dims; i++) { > LLVMValueRef floatdim; > LLVMValueRef indexi = lp_build_const_int32(gallivm, i); > _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev