Quoting Emil Velikov (2018-01-30 10:56:42)
> Hi Jon,
>
> On 28 January 2018 at 14:24, Jon Turney <jon.tur...@dronecode.org.uk> wrote:
> > ---
> > meson.build | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/meson.build b/meson.build
> > index 7e194a9f10d..8fdbaa8b8d8 100644
> > --- a/meson.build
> > +++ b/meson.build
> > @@ -935,7 +935,7 @@ elif with_dri_i965 and get_option('shader-cache')
> > endif
> >
> > # Determine whether or not the rt library is needed for time functions
> > -if cc.has_function('clock_gettime')
> > +if cc.has_function('clock_gettime') or (host_machine.system() == 'darwin')
>
> Absolutely no objections against the patch - just a small question.
> If the meson/autotools check fails, does this mean that the resulting
> binaries are having unresolved reference wrt said symbol?
>
> Thanks
> EmilNot for meson, it builds -Wl,--no-undefined (or it's MSVC equivalent) by default, so it shouldn't be possible to get unresolved symbols in a binary or shared library. I'm pretty sure that the autotools build sets --no-undefined too, right? Dylan
signature.asc
Description: signature
_______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
