From: Dave Airlie <airl...@redhat.com>

This tries to avoid an lds queue read getting scheduled separately
from an lds ret read, the non-sb code uses the same style of hammer,
this isn't foolproof.

We can do better, but it's a bit tricky, as you have to scan ahead
and either schedule more lds oq moves and more lds reads and that
could lead to you running out of space anyways.
---
 src/gallium/drivers/r600/sb/sb_sched.cpp | 3 +++
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

diff --git a/src/gallium/drivers/r600/sb/sb_sched.cpp 
b/src/gallium/drivers/r600/sb/sb_sched.cpp
index 26e4811b1c..1feef585df 100644
--- a/src/gallium/drivers/r600/sb/sb_sched.cpp
+++ b/src/gallium/drivers/r600/sb/sb_sched.cpp
@@ -2034,6 +2034,9 @@ bool alu_clause_tracker::check_clause_limits() {
        // ...and index registers
        reserve_slots += (current_idx[0] != NULL) + (current_idx[1] != NULL);
 
+       if (gt.get_consumes_lds_oqa() && !outstanding_lds_oqa_reads)
+               reserve_slots += 60;
+
        if (slot_count + slots > MAX_ALU_SLOTS - reserve_slots)
                return false;
 
-- 
2.14.3

_______________________________________________
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev

Reply via email to