On Tue 28 Nov 2017, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
> This is a modified version of the patch originally sent by Chad Versace.
> The primary difference is that this version claims that OPQAUE_FD and
> DMA_BUF are compatible handle types.
> ---
>  src/intel/vulkan/anv_device.c      | 13 ++++++-------
>  src/intel/vulkan/anv_extensions.py |  1 +
>  src/intel/vulkan/anv_formats.c     |  8 ++++++--
>  3 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)



> @@ -923,6 +925,7 @@ VkResult anv_GetPhysicalDeviceImageFormatProperties2KHR(
>     if (external_info && external_info->handleType != 0) {
>        switch (external_info->handleType) {
>        case VK_EXTERNAL_MEMORY_HANDLE_TYPE_OPAQUE_FD_BIT_KHR:
> +      case VK_EXTERNAL_MEMORY_HANDLE_TYPE_DMA_BUF_BIT_EXT:

I reflexively perceive this hunk as incorrect. My instinct screams "No!
We we must allow binding VkImage to dma-buf-backed VkDeviceMemory *only*
when the VkImage is simple.". Of course, all the discussions around
VK_EXT_queue_family_foreign changed that requirement. It will take some
time to re-orient my intuition here.

>           if (external_props)
>              external_props->externalMemoryProperties = prime_fd_props;
>           break;
_______________________________________________
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev

Reply via email to