On Wednesday, 2017-11-15 17:16:52 -0700, Brian Paul wrote:
> For checking that bitfields are large enough to hold the largest
> expected value.
>
> v2: move into existing util/macros.h header where STATIC_ASSERT() lives.
> ---
> src/util/macros.h | 16 ++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/src/util/macros.h b/src/util/macros.h
> index a9a52a1..3fd0ffd 100644
> --- a/src/util/macros.h
> +++ b/src/util/macros.h
> @@ -68,6 +68,22 @@
>
>
> /**
> + * Check that STRUCT::FIELD can hold MAXVAL. We use a lot of bitfields
> + * in Mesa/gallium. We have to be sure they're of sufficient size to
> + * hold the largest expected value.
> + * Note that with MSVC, enums are signed and enum bitfields need one extra
> + * high bit (always zero) to ensure the max value is handled correctly.
> + * This macro will detect that with MSVC, but not GCC.
> + */
> +#define ASSERT_BITFIELD_SIZE(STRUCT, FIELD, MAXVAL) \
> + do { \
> + STRUCT s; \
> + s.FIELD = (MAXVAL); \
> + assert((int) s.FIELD == (MAXVAL) && "Insufficient bitfield size!"); \
I think this will give a 'set but unused var' warning on non-assert
builds; wrap the macro in `#ifndef NDEBUG`?
> + } while (0)
> +
> +
> +/**
> * Unreachable macro. Useful for suppressing "control reaches end of non-void
> * function" warnings.
> */
> --
> 1.9.1
>
_______________________________________________
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
