On 11/12/17 3:53 AM, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
It's common to use signed int modulo in GLSL. As it happens, the GLSL
specs allow the result to be undefined, but that seems fairly
surprising. It's not that much more effort to get it right, at least for
positive modulo operators.
Signed-off-by: Ilia Mirkin <imir...@alum.mit.edu>
---
v1 -> v2:
- fix SHLADD folding with relaxed isPow2 function
- use correct FILE_PREDICATE/FILE_FLAGS variant on nv50/nvc0
src/gallium/drivers/nouveau/codegen/nv50_ir.cpp | 8 +------
.../drivers/nouveau/codegen/nv50_ir_peephole.cpp | 28 +++++++++++++++++++---
2 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/gallium/drivers/nouveau/codegen/nv50_ir.cpp
b/src/gallium/drivers/nouveau/codegen/nv50_ir.cpp
index 4076177e56d..657784163b3 100644
--- a/src/gallium/drivers/nouveau/codegen/nv50_ir.cpp
+++ b/src/gallium/drivers/nouveau/codegen/nv50_ir.cpp
@@ -429,13 +429,7 @@ ImmediateValue::isNegative() const
bool
ImmediateValue::isPow2() const
{
- switch (reg.type) {
- case TYPE_U8:
- case TYPE_U16:
- case TYPE_U32: return util_is_power_of_two(reg.data.u32);
- default:
- return false;
- }
+ return util_is_power_of_two(reg.data.u32);
}
maybe go back to special casing UINT/INT again here, instead of fixing
up SHLADD in the next hunk?
void
diff --git a/src/gallium/drivers/nouveau/codegen/nv50_ir_peephole.cpp
b/src/gallium/drivers/nouveau/codegen/nv50_ir_peephole.cpp
index 7e4e193e3d2..5028fd71951 100644
--- a/src/gallium/drivers/nouveau/codegen/nv50_ir_peephole.cpp
+++ b/src/gallium/drivers/nouveau/codegen/nv50_ir_peephole.cpp
@@ -1054,6 +1054,7 @@ ConstantFolding::opnd(Instruction *i, ImmediateValue
&imm0, int s)
i->op = OP_ADD;
} else
if (s == 1 && !imm0.isNegative() && imm0.isPow2() &&
+ !isFloatType(i->dType) &&
target->isOpSupported(OP_SHLADD, i->dType)) {
i->op = OP_SHLADD;
imm0.applyLog2();
@@ -1163,10 +1164,31 @@ ConstantFolding::opnd(Instruction *i, ImmediateValue
&imm0, int s)
break;
case OP_MOD:
- if (i->sType == TYPE_U32 && imm0.isPow2()) {
+ if (s == 1 && imm0.isPow2()) {
bld.setPosition(i, false);
- i->op = OP_AND;
- i->setSrc(1, bld.loadImm(NULL, imm0.reg.data.u32 - 1));
+ if (i->sType == TYPE_U32) {
+ i->op = OP_AND;
+ i->setSrc(1, bld.loadImm(NULL, imm0.reg.data.u32 - 1));
+ } else if (i->sType == TYPE_S32) {
+ // Do it on the absolute value of the input, and then restore the
+ // sign. The only odd case is MIN_INT, but that should work out
+ // as well, since MIN_INT mod any power of 2 is 0.
+ //
+ // Technically we don't have to do any of this since MOD is
+ // undefined with negative arguments in GLSL, but this seems like
+ // the nice thing to do.
+ Value *abs = bld.mkOp1v(OP_ABS, TYPE_S32, bld.getSSA(),
i->getSrc(0));
+ Value *neg, *v1, *v2;
+ bld.mkCmp(OP_SET, CC_LT, TYPE_S32, (neg = bld.getSSA(1,
prog->getTarget()->nativeFile(FILE_PREDICATE))), TYPE_S32, i->getSrc(0),
bld.loadImm(NULL, 0));
+ Value *mod = bld.mkOp2v(OP_AND, TYPE_U32, bld.getSSA(), abs,
bld.loadImm(NULL, imm0.reg.data.u32 - 1));
have a few linebreakes here, but i don't have to tell ya that (still
considered experimental? :D)
+ bld.mkOp1(OP_NEG, TYPE_S32, (v1 = bld.getSSA()), mod)
+ ->setPredicate(CC_P, neg);
+ bld.mkOp1(OP_MOV, TYPE_S32, (v2 = bld.getSSA()), mod)
+ ->setPredicate(CC_NOT_P, neg);
+ newi = bld.mkOp2(OP_UNION, TYPE_S32, i->getDef(0), v1, v2);
+
+ delete_Instruction(prog, i);
+ }
}
break;
The patch looks fine otherwise, i will test it a bit later and see if i
can trigger something else with it!
Greetings,
Tobias
_______________________________________________
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
