On 31 October 2017 at 21:07, Dylan Baker <dy...@pnwbakers.com> wrote: > Quoting Emil Velikov (2017-10-30 10:47:22) >> On 30 October 2017 at 17:05, Dylan Baker <dy...@pnwbakers.com> wrote: >> > So I think the consensus is this is okay? >> > >> > Emil, is the autotools right here? >> > >> >> Without a clear separation or cleanup of the the existing code, this >> such move brings no technical benefit. >> If anything, it makes it harder for people [roughly] familiar with >> current setup. >> >> i was wondering if we can nuke wl_drm, but I don't see that happening >> anytime soon :-( >> >> -Emil > > How strong is your objection Emil? > > My intention is to pull some of the generated files that are shared > between vulkan/wsi/wayland and egl/wayland/wayland-drm. Daniel has said that > he > has more generated files that will be shared between them in work he is doing > currently, and putting them in neither EGL or Wayland would make the build > cleaner, and that's the intention of this series. > Across various systems I have over ~10 different branches that cover egl, gbm and friends. I have to admit that the goal is very admirable, but it would seriously hinder attempts to get those sorted.
If the key issue is wayland-drm - we should be able to move the XML file to wayland-protocols? This way it will be a bit more straightforward, we can drop the 4 copies of it with a single canonical one. I'll same a patch for that later on today/early tomorrow. Thanks Emil _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
