On Tue, 17 Jan 2012 15:58:11 -0500, Matt Turner <matts...@gmail.com> wrote:
As far as I can tell, the point of AM_CPPFLAGS existing is if you want to make a target that separately calls the preprocessor, so you a list of includes and a list of non-preprocessor compiler flags. Given that we don't have any preprocessor invocations, we're sure to leak actual cflags into the cppflags, so I don't see why we'd make this change..
pgpYyyaleBhko.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
