Timothy Arceri <tarc...@itsqueeze.com> writes: > We won't split varyings marked as always active because there > is no point in doing so. This means we need to mark both > sides of the interface as always active otherwise we will have > a mismatch and start removing things we shouldn't.
Is this just needed because the next patch only updates a single bit in the read/write arrays for multi-channel variables? Or is there something else? If there's nothing else, then updating the NIR pass for tracking all of the channels seems pretty doable and would have fewer magic requirements between stages.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
