On 15 September 2017 at 16:41, Daniel Stone <dan...@fooishbar.org> wrote: > Hi, > > On 15 September 2017 at 16:13, Emil Velikov <emil.l.veli...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On 15 September 2017 at 15:13, Daniel Stone <dan...@fooishbar.org> wrote: >>> But if you avoid wl_resource_instance_of() and replace it with >>> wl_resource_get_destroy_listener(), you can side-step the problem, by >>> not relying on consistent resolution of wl_buffer_interface. That's a >>> real bugfix. :) >> >> Right, I'm looking through both functions and I'm struggling a bit. >> Can I bother you with sending a patch? > > Sure. This is only compile-tested, but: https://hastebin.com/mudacudeya > It looks a bit icky and my Wayland knowledge is limited to actually review it.
I still think that we're trying to do different things - me simplify things, while you're focusing on fixing a bug. That said, thanks again for the reviews - I've pushed the rest of the series. -Emil _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
