On 2017-09-14 15:36:10, Romain Failliot wrote: > Le 14 sept. 2017 6:11 PM, "Bas Nieuwenhuizen" <b...@basnieuwenhuizen.nl> a > écrit : > > > For vulkan, because 1.0 is the initial version, there are no > > extensions to implement to get to that version, so having an > > extensions list would be nonsensical. > > I don't think it is nonsensical, say the nouveau devs starts to work on a > Vulkan 1.0 driver and they'd like to show their progress in features.txt. I > think it would be interesting for them to have the list of extensions to > implement to be Vulkan 1.0 compliant, so they could flag which extensions > are done, in progress or not started.
That would be fine, except I don't think the 1.0 features are bucketed into a set of 'extensions'. Right? I thought 1.0 was the baseline, and extensions were built upon that. -Jordan _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
