While investigating an etracer issue on Ivybridge, I did a lot of careful reading of the tracked state atoms' dirty bits. Found a bunch of issues. Unfortunately, none of these patches fixed the issues I was seeing.
While we're at it: BRW_NEW_CONTEXT seems like the wrong thing in basically every case. Until we get MI_SET_CONTEXT, we always want to use NEW_BATCH. Or am I missing something? I mean, NEW_CONTEXT won't hurt, but seems superfluous. I'm also uncertain whether things like gen6_cc need to listen to BRW_NEW_STATE_BASE_ADDRESS or not. _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
