Quoting Kenneth Graunke (2017-09-06 01:09:39)
> Prior to the previous patch, we would pwrite the batchbuffer contents,
> and wanted to skip the execbuffer if that failed. Now, we write things
> directly to the map, so we don't need this check.
> ---
> src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/intel_batchbuffer.c | 40
> ++++++++++++---------------
> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/intel_batchbuffer.c
> b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/intel_batchbuffer.c
> index 9b37470f926..df094bb6047 100644
> --- a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/intel_batchbuffer.c
> +++ b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/intel_batchbuffer.c
> @@ -199,8 +199,6 @@ intel_batchbuffer_reset_to_saved(struct brw_context *brw)
> void
> intel_batchbuffer_free(struct intel_batchbuffer *batch)
> {
> - free(batch->cpu_map);
Stray from previous patch.
-Chris
_______________________________________________
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
