On 2017-07-31 16:08:51, Bas Nieuwenhuizen wrote: > On Tue, Aug 1, 2017 at 12:32 AM, Jordan Justen > > +Vulkan 1.0 -- all DONE: anv > > So while we don't have conformance, we have at several times had local > conformance suite runs pass all tests, so I think we can write up radv > as all done here too?
Ok, I can add radv here if you recommend it. > > + > > +Khronos and EXT extensions that are not part of any Vulkan version: > > + VK_EXT_acquire_xlib_display not started > > + VK_EXT_blend_operation_advanced not started > > + VK_EXT_debug_marker not started > > Do we even want to implement this as driver, or let this be for the layers? I just used grep to find the extensions. If the consensus is to drop this, I can do that. > > + VK_KHX_multiview DONE (anv) > > I started this one for radv too, not sure if we put those in if one > driver already has them though. Based on GL, I don't think we have a way to indicate that it is started for another driver after one has completed it. Do you have a recommendation? Side note: Looking at the header of the file, it looks like I should use 'in progress' rather than 'started'. > btw, no vendor extensions? Looking at the 'Khronos, ARB, and OES extensions that are not part of any OpenGL or OpenGL ES version' section, it doesn't seem to include vendor extensions. I did see a few 'NV' extensions in other sections of the file, but I think in those cases they were rolled into the core versions. Should we add another section for extensions that at least 1 driver has implemented or started to implement? -Jordan _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
