https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101666
--- Comment #4 from Ilia Mirkin <imir...@alum.mit.edu> ---
The predicate is correct, just never checked.
On Jul 2, 2017 15:08, <bugzilla-dae...@freedesktop.org> wrote:
> *Comment # 3 <https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101666#c3> on
> bug 101666 <https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101666> from
> Kenneth Graunke <kenn...@whitecape.org> *
>
> I don't think you need to change any infrastructure, we just didn't add the
> proper built-in availability predicate to the bitfieldExtract functions in
> builtin_functions.cpp. it should be trivial to fix - this is by no means a
> new
> case...
>
> ------------------------------
> You are receiving this mail because:
>
> - You are the assignee for the bug.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> mesa-dev mailing list
> mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
>
>
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
