Hi Tim,
On 22 June 2017 at 22:13, Tim Rowley <timothy.o.row...@intel.com> wrote:
> Switch from a macro-based simd intrinsics layer to a more C++
> implementation, which also adds AVX512 optimizations to 128-bit
> and 256-bit SIMD.
> + rasterizer/common/simdlib_128_avx.inl \
> + rasterizer/common/simdlib_128_avx2.inl \
> + rasterizer/common/simdlib_128_avx512.inl \
> + rasterizer/common/simdlib_256_avx.inl \
> + rasterizer/common/simdlib_256_avx2.inl \
> + rasterizer/common/simdlib_256_avx512.inl \
> + rasterizer/common/simdlib_512_avx512.inl \
> + rasterizer/common/simdlib_512_avx512_masks.inl \
> + rasterizer/common/simdlib_512_emu.inl \
> + rasterizer/common/simdlib_512_emu_masks.inl \
Your commit message said "make dist/check" but I'd imagine you used
SCons for the whole series as well, correct?
Merely double-checking as some versions of SCons had issues with non
{c,h}{,pp} files listed as sources, IIRC. Sadly I don't recall the
specifics.
Thanks
Emil
_______________________________________________
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
