On Thu, 22 Jun 2017 at 00:12 Matt Turner <matts...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 3:50 PM, Mike Lothian <m...@fireburn.co.uk> wrote: > > Do intel run mesa through any of their test boxes like they do with > kernel > > patches? > > Don't top quote. > > Yes, we have a CI system that we use extensively and has massively > reduced the number of regressions we have. Immense thanks to Mark > Janes for all of the work he's done on it. > > In this instance, the CI didn't catch it because it tests debug builds > (as you'd expect), so the assert and the function it called were > executed. In release builds, however, the assert and that necessary > function call were removed. >
Sorry, top posting is the default in Inbox and there doesn't appear to be away to change it I wasn't criticising, it's very rare that a serious bug creaps into master, having said that it would have been nice to have a response on IRC when the issue was pointed out Least it's fixed now and I'm back to testing master again Mike >
_______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
