On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 05:18:22PM -0700, Nanley Chery wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 05:50:00PM +0300, Topi Pohjolainen wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Topi Pohjolainen <topi.pohjolai...@intel.com>
> > ---
> > src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/intel_blit.h | 13 +++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/intel_blit.h
> > b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/intel_blit.h
> > index 2604417e2d..5e4d1f5eb4 100644
> > --- a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/intel_blit.h
> > +++ b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/intel_blit.h
> > @@ -28,6 +28,19 @@
> >
> > #include "brw_context.h"
> >
> > +static inline unsigned
> > +isl_tiling_to_bufmgr_tiling(enum isl_tiling tiling)
> > +{
> > + if (tiling == ISL_TILING_X)
> > + return I915_TILING_X;
> > +
> > + if (tiling == ISL_TILING_Y0)
>
> I actually just read the patch where this function is used. Don't we
> also need to return I915_TILING_Y for ISL_TILING_W? Maybe Jason can
> confirm.
These values go to brw_bo_alloc_tiled() -> brw_bo_alloc() ->
bo_alloc_internal() which only understands Y and X. Therefore W is really
treated as NONE.
>
> > + return I915_TILING_Y;
> > +
> > + /* All other are unknown to buffer allocator. */
>
> It would seem that we'd like to assert for unexpected values instead of
> failing silently.
>
> > + return I915_TILING_NONE;
> > +}
> > +
> > bool
> > intelEmitCopyBlit(struct brw_context *brw,
> > GLuint cpp,
> > --
> > 2.11.0
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > mesa-dev mailing list
> > mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
> > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
_______________________________________________
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
