On 9 June 2017 at 14:22, Eric Engestrom <eric.engest...@imgtec.com> wrote:
> On Monday, 2017-06-05 00:03:59 +0100, Emil Velikov wrote:
>> As described inline - follow what's written in the manual and what works
>> for all platforms that Mesa supports.
>>
>> We want to untangle things leaving only -pthread, yet that has a
>> potential of causing regressions. Thus we'll do it as a follow-up patch.
>>
>> As a nice side-effect this resolves issues, where the system lacks
>> libpthread.so, yet the linker does not warn about it and we and up with
>> unresolved symbols.
>>
>> Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101071
>> Cc: mesa-sta...@lists.freedesktop.org
>> Signed-off-by: Emil Velikov <emil.veli...@collabora.com>
>
> Series is:
> Reviewed-by: Eric Engestrom <eric.engest...@imgtec.com>
>
> I think you should push 1+3+4, 2 can wait for the various confirmations
> you requested.
>
Thanks Eric. Actually patch 3/4 depends on 2/4 with the latter
triggering some strange behaviour/bug elsewhere.
Documentation is a bit lacklustre, so I might put those on hold.

I'll push 1+4 in a second. Thanks
Emil
_______________________________________________
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev

Reply via email to