On 08/06/17 03:42 AM, Marek Olšák wrote: > On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 4:10 PM, Aaron Watry <awa...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 3:07 PM, Marek Olšák <mar...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> Can you make the change in radeon_drm_winsys.c instead? >> >> Something like the following? >> >> diff --git a/src/gallium/winsys/radeon/drm/radeon_drm_winsys.c >> b/src/gallium/winsys/radeon/drm/radeon_drm_winsys.c >> index a485615ae4..44948f49ef 100644 >> --- a/src/gallium/winsys/radeon/drm/radeon_drm_winsys.c >> +++ b/src/gallium/winsys/radeon/drm/radeon_drm_winsys.c >> @@ -365,6 +365,8 @@ static bool do_winsys_init(struct radeon_drm_winsys *ws) >> /* Radeon allocates all buffers as contigous, which makes large >> allocations >> * unlikely to succeed. */ >> ws->info.max_alloc_size = MAX2(ws->info.vram_size, >> ws->info.gart_size) * 0.7; >> + if (ws->info.has_dedicated_vram) >> + ws->info.max_alloc_size = MIN2(ws->info.vram_size * 0.7, >> ws->info.max_alloc_size); >> if (ws->info.drm_minor < 40) >> ws->info.max_alloc_size = MIN2(ws->info.max_alloc_size, >> 256*1024*1024); > > Yes, feel free to push that.
That also affects PIPE_CAP_MAX_TEXTURE_BUFFER_SIZE, is that intended? -- Earthling Michel Dänzer | http://www.amd.com Libre software enthusiast | Mesa and X developer _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
