On 27/05/17 01:15, Chad Versace wrote:
> In intel_update_dri2_buffers().
> Trivial cleanup.
> ---
> src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_context.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_context.c
> b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_context.c
> index adae921e57..825912b7b5 100644
> --- a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_context.c
> +++ b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_context.c
> @@ -1410,7 +1410,7 @@ intel_update_dri2_buffers(struct brw_context *brw,
> __DRIdrawable *drawable)
> struct gl_framebuffer *fb = drawable->driverPrivate;
> struct intel_renderbuffer *rb;
> __DRIbuffer *buffers = NULL;
> - int i, count;
> + int count;
> const char *region_name;
>
> /* Set this up front, so that in case our buffers get invalidated
> @@ -1426,7 +1426,7 @@ intel_update_dri2_buffers(struct brw_context *brw,
> __DRIdrawable *drawable)
> if (buffers == NULL)
> return;
>
> - for (i = 0; i < count; i++) {
> + for (int i = 0; i < count; i++) {
> switch (buffers[i].attachment) {
> case __DRI_BUFFER_FRONT_LEFT:
> rb = intel_get_renderbuffer(fb, BUFFER_FRONT_LEFT);
>
Same comment as in patch 2, this requires C99. Do we compile mesa in c99
nowadays?
_______________________________________________
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
