On Wed, 14 Dec 2011 08:06:20 -0800, Paul Berry <stereotype...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 14 December 2011 02:33, Kenneth Graunke <kenn...@whitecape.org> wrote: > > I think the point is that the ARF null register doesn't have a value, so > > null<0,1,0> is just as good as null<4,4,1> or null<8,8,1>. Either way > > you get nothing and write nothing. So width is irrelevant other than > > dodging this assertion. > > > > If we weren't guessing execution size based on the register widths, I'd > > prefer to just change the null reg to have width 1. But since we do, > > that would be a royal pain, and this is nice and simple. I'm definitely > > in favor of this patch. > > > > Agreed. The whole "guessing execution size" thing has always troubled me, > but I haven't thought of a good alternative.
Me too.
pgpgwjuzrT6uI.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
