On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 02:00:53PM -0700, Jason Ekstrand wrote: > This doesn't matter right now since it only affects whether or not we > set the kernel bit but, if we ever do anything else based on it, we'll > want it to be correct per-gen. > --- > src/intel/vulkan/anv_device.c | 7 ++++++- > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
This patch is Reviewed-by: Nanley Chery <nanley.g.ch...@intel.com> > > diff --git a/src/intel/vulkan/anv_device.c b/src/intel/vulkan/anv_device.c > index 50486b6..b80715f 100644 > --- a/src/intel/vulkan/anv_device.c > +++ b/src/intel/vulkan/anv_device.c > @@ -225,7 +225,12 @@ anv_physical_device_init(struct anv_physical_device > *device, > goto fail; > } > > - device->supports_48bit_addresses = anv_gem_supports_48b_addresses(fd); > + /* The kernel query only tells us whether or not the kernel supports the > + * EXEC_OBJECT_SUPPORTS_48B_ADDRESS flag and not whether or not the > + * hardware has actual 48bit address support. > + */ > + device->supports_48bit_addresses = > + (device->info.gen >= 8) && anv_gem_supports_48b_addresses(fd); > > result = anv_compute_heap_size(fd, &device->heap_size); > if (result != VK_SUCCESS) > -- > 2.5.0.400.gff86faf > > _______________________________________________ > mesa-dev mailing list > mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
