On 05/18/2017 12:16 AM, Tomasz Figa wrote:
Hi,

On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 11:35 PM, Tapani Pälli <tapani.pa...@intel.com> wrote:

On 05/16/2017 08:10 PM, Chad Versace wrote:
On Tue 16 May 2017, Tapani Pälli wrote:


On 05/16/2017 02:04 AM, Chad Versace wrote:
Fixes regressions in Android CtsVerifier.apk on Intel Chrome OS devices
due to incorrect error handling in eglMakeCurrent. See below on how to
confirm the regression is fixed.

This partially reverts

       commit 23c86c74cc450a23848b85cfe914376caede1cdf
       Author:  Chad Versace <chadvers...@chromium.org>
       Subject: egl: Emit error when EGLSurface is lost

The bad commit added the error handling below. #2 and #3 were right,
but #1 was wrong.

       1. eglMakeCurrent emits EGL_BAD_CURRENT_SURFACE if the calling
          thread has unflushed commands and either previous surface is no
          longer valid.

       2. eglMakeCurrent emits EGL_BAD_NATIVE_WINDOW if either new
surface
          is no longer valid.

       3. eglSwapBuffers emits EGL_BAD_NATIVE_WINDOW if the swapped
surface
          is no longer valid.

Whe I wrote the bad commit, I misunderstood the EGL spec language
for #1. The correct behavior is, if I understand correctly now:

       - Assume a bound EGLSurface is no longer valid.
       - Assume the bound EGLContext has unflushed commands.
       - The app calls eglMakeCurrent. The spec requires eglMakeCurrent
to
         implicitly flush. After flushing, eglMakeCurrent emits
         EGL_BAD_CURRENT_SURFACE and does *not* alter the thread's
         current bindings.
       - If the app calls eglMakeCurrent again, and the app inserts no
         commands into the GL command stream between the two
eglMakeCurrent
         calls, then this second eglMakeCurrent succeeds without emitting
an
         error.

How to confirm this fixes the regression:

       Download android-cts-verifier-7.1_r5-linux_x86-x86.zip from
       source.android.com, unpack, and `adb install CtsVerifier.apk`.
       Run test "Projection Cube". Click the Pass button (a
       green checkmark). Then run test "Projection Widget". Confirm that
       widgets are visible and that logcat does not complain about
       eglMakeCurrent failure.

       Then confirm there are no regressions in the cts-traded module
that
       commit 263243b1 fixed:

           cts-tf > run cts --skip-preconditions --skip-device-info \
                    -m CtsCameraTestCases \
                    -t android.hardware.camera2.cts.RobustnessTest

       Tested with Chrome OS board "reef".

both tests passed on Android-IA with this patch ... but if I minimize
"Projection Widget" test it starts to bang EGL_BAD_NATIVE_WINDOW heavily.
Is
this expected behavior?

I'm unsure. I haven't yet tried that experiment. I'll give it a try when
I'm back at my desk.

Which EGL function is emitting EGL_BAD_NATIVE_WINDOW in logcat?
eglMakeCurrent or eglSwapBuffers, or something else?

doh sorry, I actually meant 'Projection Cube' test, not the widget test. But
yep, when tapping switcher button eglMakeCurrent starts to emit the error
(likely the app just continues to submit frames even when it's
'minimized'?). When switching back to app it cannot draw anymore as it keeps
getting the error.
I don't remember exactly and I'm not an Android app expert either, but
I remember hearing something that the app needs to stop drawing when
the activity is paused (stopped?). Isn't that what's happening when an
app gets minimized?

Yep, this is very likely the case and the app here is just not obeying the rules. Considering that Android wraps EGL layer it seems weird that it just let's application to do this. Any case, since everything else works fine this is definitely not a blocker for me for this patch;

Acked-by: Tapani Pälli <tapani.pa...@intel.com>

Best regards,
Tomasz

What was the behavior before this patch? And before
commit 23c86c74 (egl: Emit error when EGLSurface is lost)?

Without this patch (and before commit 23c86c74) I can minimize app to
switcher and bring it back and it continues to draw.

Note that everything else seems to work just fine though (tested lots of GL
apps) so is this just something specific what cts-verifier is doing or not
handling properly?



Cc: "17.1" <mesa-sta...@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: Tomasz Figa <tf...@chromium.org>
Cc: Nicolas Boichat <drink...@chromium.org>
Cc: Emil Velikov <emil.veli...@collabora.com>
Fixes: 23c86c74 (egl: Emit error when EGLSurface is lost)
---
    src/egl/main/eglapi.c | 19 -------------------
    1 file changed, 19 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/egl/main/eglapi.c b/src/egl/main/eglapi.c
index aa0eb94666..9cea2f41ff 100644
--- a/src/egl/main/eglapi.c
+++ b/src/egl/main/eglapi.c
@@ -828,25 +828,6 @@ eglMakeCurrent(EGLDisplay dpy, EGLSurface draw,
EGLSurface read,
             RETURN_EGL_ERROR(disp, EGL_BAD_MATCH, EGL_FALSE);
       }
-   _EGLThreadInfo *t =_eglGetCurrentThread();
-   _EGLContext *old_ctx = t->CurrentContext;
-   _EGLSurface *old_draw_surf = old_ctx ? old_ctx->DrawSurface : NULL;
-   _EGLSurface *old_read_surf = old_ctx ? old_ctx->ReadSurface : NULL;
-
-   /* From the EGL 1.5 spec, Section 3.7.3 Binding Context and
Drawables:
-    *
-    *    If the previous context of the calling thread has unflushed
commands,
-    *    and the previous surface is no longer valid, an
-    *    EGL_BAD_CURRENT_SURFACE error is generated.
-    *
-    * It's difficult to check if the context has unflushed commands,
but it's
-    * easy to check if the surface is no longer valid.
-    */
-   if (old_draw_surf && old_draw_surf->Lost)
-      RETURN_EGL_ERROR(disp, EGL_BAD_CURRENT_SURFACE, EGL_FALSE);
-   if (old_read_surf && old_read_surf->Lost)
-      RETURN_EGL_ERROR(disp, EGL_BAD_CURRENT_SURFACE, EGL_FALSE);
-
       /*    If a native window underlying either draw or read is no
longer valid,
        *    an EGL_BAD_NATIVE_WINDOW error is generated.
        */

_______________________________________________
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
_______________________________________________
mesa-stable mailing list
mesa-sta...@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-stable


_______________________________________________
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev

Reply via email to