On 16 May 2017 at 14:26, Emil Velikov <emil.l.veli...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 16 May 2017 at 02:07, Timothy Arceri <tarc...@itsqueeze.com> wrote: >> On 16/05/17 10:47, Kenneth Graunke wrote: >>> >>> On Monday, May 15, 2017 4:06:31 PM PDT Timothy Arceri wrote: >>>> >>>> On 16/05/17 08:13, Ian Romanick wrote: >>>>> >>>>> On 04/23/2017 10:28 PM, Timothy Arceri wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> diff --git a/src/mapi/glapi/gen/APPLE_vertex_array_object.xml >>>>>> b/src/mapi/glapi/gen/APPLE_vertex_array_object.xml >>>>>> deleted file mode 100644 >>>>>> index 7312f9b..0000000 >>>>>> --- a/src/mapi/glapi/gen/APPLE_vertex_array_object.xml >>>>>> +++ /dev/null >>>>>> @@ -1,27 +0,0 @@ >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> So... I'm fairly sure this is going to break loading a _dri.so built >>>>> without this patch by a libGL built with this patch. >>>> >>>> >>>> I recall something like this coming up a few year ago, can you remind me >>>> again why this is a problem? Shouldn't these be updated in sync? >>> >>>
> On the patch itself I need to double-check, but I think it would be > fine. Please don't quote me :-) > Double-checking: - linux_gl_abi must stay as-is, period. - known_dispatch can: a) drop symbols, only if marked as exec=skip or exec=dynamic Note that changing the symbols' exec model and then removing them is a no-go. For example 5aaabd7630ca6fd72a3333687249574e6fcbe663 b) grow new symbols - those symbols are normally not be annotated as exec=skip or exec=dynamic 504f5f9d1a4fb5a0ddc8a5d0bf73fd6eba96b1d0 c) rename symbols - only if the new/old names are aliases of one another 8e3a7c620440fab014e41b18badf73ca9dfdba45 ian, others, can anyone confirm if the above is correct? Once confirmed I will prep a patch that adds a bunch of comments in the test. -Emil _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
