On 8 May 2017 at 00:25, Dieter Nützel <die...@nuetzel-hh.de> wrote: > Am 26.04.2017 14:37, schrieb tournier.elie: >> >> Hello, >> >> I'm not an r600g person but I will be pleased to have a look to this work. > > > Hello Elie, > > I know, read most of your posts about your 'former' fp64 lib which was > indeed HW-agnostic. > >> I'm currently working on the fp64 for r600g. Hope to be able to send a >> series in fews days. > > > Do you have something handy for testing? > My r600g (Turks XT / HD 6670) times run out... ;-) > https://www.phoronix.com/forums/forum/phoronix/latest-phoronix-articles/950505-radeon-rx-550-amdgpu-pro-vs-drm-next-mesa-17-2-dev?p=950577#post950577 >
I can use LLVM pipe / softpipe to test the code. Moreover, Andreas Boll helps me to test the code. He own a r600g card. >> The fp64 code is not HW specific, I can test it on my laptop with an >> Intel card. I don't even own a r600g card. > > > Do you want my above card for testing r600g? Thanks you for the offer but I don't have a tower here. > >> Have a nice day. > > > Have a nice spring, late here in old (northern) Europe... > I'm not sure there are a spring or summer here in Cambridge, UK. ;-) Elie > Dieter > > >> On 25 April 2017 at 03:00, Dieter Nützel <die...@nuetzel-hh.de> wrote: >>> >>> Am 12.04.2017 22:06, schrieb Dave Airlie: >>>> >>>> >>>> On 13 April 2017 at 06:03, Markus Trippelsdorf <mar...@trippelsdorf.de> >>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 2017.04.12 at 20:45 +0100, Emil Velikov wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On 12 April 2017 at 20:34, Constantine Kharlamov <hi-an...@yandex.ru> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >> I suspect this breaks because r600 more often fails to >>>>>> >> compile some shaders, >>>>>> >> and the hw requires a fragment shader and we use the empty one as a >>>>>> >> fallback in that case. >>>>>> > >>>>>> > Ok, that wasn't obvious, I running the system with the patchset on >>>>>> > HD5730, including >>>>>> > piglit testing — so far is fine. >>>>>> > >>>>>> If in doubt ask the bug reporter(s) to test a patch on their machines. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Well, the question is why bother with this legacy code at all? >>>>> I would expect a much more conservative approach. Except for essential >>>>> patches to keep the hardware running, everything else should be >>>>> rejected. Nobody is expecting new features for this ancient hardware >>>>> anyway. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> I do have 90% of GL4.3 for evergreen and newer done in a branch, >>>> >>>> It's just a lack of time to fix the last few hangs and motivate myself >>>> to get it posted/reviewied. >>>> >>>> Then of course getting sb support. >>>> >>>> Dave. >>> >>> >>> >>> Hello Dave, >>> >>> can you please send the link to your latest work on this? >>> So someone (we) can have a look and learn/maybe fix it. >>> Maybe Elie step in and offer fp64 for r600g if he has some time left. >>> My times on r600g come to an end... >>> RX 580, 8 GB, Nitro+ is coming on Friday/Saturday, Yeahhhh ;-) >>> >>> Then I have to decide if I hold the Turks XT (6670) or to comp it. >>> >>> Greetings around the world! >>> >>> Dieter _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
