On Wednesday, May 3, 2017 10:10:59 PM PDT Pohjolainen, Topi wrote: > On Thu, May 04, 2017 at 05:49:08AM +0300, Pohjolainen, Topi wrote: > > On Wed, May 03, 2017 at 05:08:12PM -0700, Rafael Antognolli wrote: > > > On Wed, May 03, 2017 at 09:10:10PM +0300, Pohjolainen, Topi wrote: > > > > > > > > In the subject: s/ge5/gen5/ > > > > > > > > But don't we need to squash this into the previous patch? Alone that > > > > patch > > > > won't even link, right? > > > > > > Yes, you are right, it should be squashed. > > > > Ok, thanks. I already gave my r-b there before noticing it was broken. So > > now we are good regardging these two. > > Now looking at patch 15 I realized that this patch actually can be separate - > we just need to put it between patches 15 and 16. Could you try that?
I squashed it into the previous two patches - the makefile rules should have been part of patch 15, and the g45 atom prototype should have been part of patch 16. --Ken
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
