> On Mar 19, 2017, at 4:37 PM, Emil Velikov <emil.l.veli...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On 19 March 2017 at 22:16, Miklós Máté <mtm...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On 19/03/17 22:13, Emil Velikov wrote: >>> >>> Hi Miklós, >>> >>> On 19 March 2017 at 12:28, Miklós Máté <mtm...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> After this series the build goes further, but eventually stops with: >>>> scons: Building targets ... >>>> Archiving build\windows-x86-debug\gallium\auxiliary\libgallium.a ... >>>> Installing build\windows-x86-debug\bin\u_atomic_test.exe ... >>>> Compiling src\gallium\tests\unit\u_format_compatible_test.c ... >>>> The command line is too long. >>>> scons: *** [build\windows-x86-debug\gallium\auxiliary\libgallium.a] >>>> Error 1 >>>> scons: building terminated because of errors. >>>> >>>> To fix this error one would probably need to compile gallium/auxillary >>>> into 2-3 >>>> smaller archives and then compose them into libgallium.a. Unfortunately, >>>> my >>>> buildsystem knowledge is too weak for this. >>>> >>> Can you elaborate why/how you're building things on your end. >>> >>> Appveyor (admittedly using MSVC) and local [Archlinux] >>> cross-compilation via mingw-w64 works like a charm without any of >>> these. >>> Are you using the 'old' mingw aka mingw32 - it looks abandoned, so I'd >>> suggest sticking with the "w64" one. >> >> I have very limited knowledge about windows, I just wanted to help Federico >> with his quest of running kotor with llvmpipe on windows. I saw in the mesa >> documentation that I can use mingw to build it, I googled mingw, the first >> result was mingw.org, the download link took me to sourceforge, and I >> downloaded the installer from there. Now I see that there is also a >> mingw-w64.org. Oh well. >> > Right - we might as well correct documentation/build to explicitly > state mingw-w64. > > Jose considering the issues reported I'm assuming that you guys are > using the w64 one, if any ?
Yeah, just w64. > Any objections if we "deprecate" support for mingw-w32 ? I think that’s OK. -Brian > >>> >>> Can I ask you to try and hookup mingw into our Appveyor builds - it >>> should be possible to use it but I haven't tried. >> >> I can try, but my experience in this area is very limited. >> > Link Appveyor with your Github account (iirc you don't even need an > account for the former) and experiment ;-) > >> >>> >>>> Miklós Máté (2): >>>> c11: fix include with mingw >>> >>> This one might be ok, need to check. >>> >>>> c11: comment out thrd_equal() >>>> >>> But this one is not - if anything we need to fix the 'interesting' >>> Windows code in MAPI to use it. I've got some work in the area, that I >>> really should finish on of these days. >> >> OK, nevermind then. >> > It's an issue on our end, but thank you very much for pointing out it. > If you'd can spot any references to mingw and update those to > mingw-w64 [sending a patch or two] that will be greatly appreciated ! > > Thanks > Emil > _______________________________________________ > mesa-dev mailing list > mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.freedesktop.org_mailman_listinfo_mesa-2Ddev&d=DwIGaQ&c=uilaK90D4TOVoH58JNXRgQ&r=Ie7_encNUsqxbSRbqbNgofw0ITcfE8JKfaUjIQhncGA&m=RJP1oYpsZQACs3N2lWWpMzncTxAYFyVTCsLsGyVYhhM&s=sj0L7qdKjjG339cDt6mc_0oC7Y9yqCYSvf-7OFJlaSs&e= > _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
