On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 11:03 AM, Emil Velikov <emil.l.veli...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 20 March 2017 at 01:33, Rob Herring <r...@kernel.org> wrote: >> Any users of KitKat are likely using an older version of Mesa and >> KitKat support adds complexity to the make files. Dropping support >> allows removing the MESA_LOLLIPOP_BUILD make variable in various make >> files. >> > > Please mention why we're safe to drop the external/libcxx/include > include. If you can say when libcxx (?) was fixed that'll be a bonus.
Actually, looks like it is still needed for L and M. > >> Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <r...@kernel.org> >> --- >> Android.common.mk | 19 +++++++------------ >> Android.mk | 8 -------- >> src/egl/Android.mk | 4 ---- >> src/gallium/drivers/nouveau/Android.mk | 5 ----- >> src/gallium/drivers/r600/Android.mk | 5 ----- >> src/gallium/targets/dri/Android.mk | 11 ++--------- >> src/mesa/drivers/dri/i915/Android.mk | 6 ------ >> src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/Android.mk | 6 ------ >> 8 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 55 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/Android.common.mk b/Android.common.mk >> index 7431b1d3dc5b..6b64c38d4d30 100644 >> --- a/Android.common.mk >> +++ b/Android.common.mk >> @@ -66,7 +66,10 @@ LOCAL_CFLAGS += \ >> LOCAL_CPPFLAGS += \ >> -D__STDC_CONSTANT_MACROS \ >> -D__STDC_FORMAT_MACROS \ >> - -D__STDC_LIMIT_MACROS >> + -D__STDC_LIMIT_MACROS \ >> + -D_USING_LIBCXX \ > I second Chih-Wei here - we don't need this define. It is a left over > from the early/incomplete version of the nouveau fixes. > >> + -Wno-error=non-virtual-dtor \ >> + -Wno-non-virtual-dtor \ >> > Please drop the trailing \ > > >> +LOCAL_MODULE_REL_PATH ?= $(MESA_DRI_MODULE_REL_PATH) > This one is meant to be "RELATIVE" as opposed to "REL" correct ? > Personally I'd keep that in the separate makefiles, but I won't object > (to much ;-) if you prefer it here. > >> @@ -118,7 +111,7 @@ LOCAL_STATIC_LIBRARIES += \ >> libLLVMR600Info \ >> libLLVMR600AsmPrinter \ >> libelf >> -LOCAL_LDLIBS += $(if $(filter true,$(MESA_LOLLIPOP_BUILD)),-lgcc) >> +LOCAL_LDLIBS += -lgcc > Would be great if we can a comment why we need this. But that's > unrelated to this patch of course. I've got no idea. Given we build with clang now, I'd guess we don't need it at least on N+. Rob _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
